Wildlife Act Review
Fish, wildlife and habitat conservation in British Columbia is significantly underfunded, with current investments falling far short of what is needed to protect and restore ecosystems across the province
Protecting wildlife and habitat in British Columbia
300,000+ British Columbians
The strength of our advocacy comes from our diversity. By bringing together traditionally separate groups under a shared respect for nature, we ensure that the provincial government hears the collective voice of BC’s outdoor community. Healthy habitats mean abundant wildlife, thriving fish populations, and a vibrant future for outdoor recreation.
Why We Need Dedicated, Stable Funding for Wildlife
The Wildlife Act must establish conservation of wildlife and habitat as a legislated objective that guides decisions across government. Equally important is the establishment of a dedicated conservation fund. Fish, wildlife and habitat conservation in British Columbia is significantly underfunded, with current investments falling far short of what is needed to protect and restore ecosystems across the province.
Our asks are:
- Legislated Objectives for Wildlife and Habitat
- Dedicated, Stable Funding
- Independent Science, Transparency, and Clarity
- Governance Reform and Accountability
1. Legislated Objectives for Wildlife and Habitat
Core Position: The Wildlife Act must establish conservation of wildlife and habitat as a legislated objective that guides decisions across government.
Key Asks:
- Legislated objectives that allow the Wildlife Act to influence activities impacting habitat
- Include cumulative effects assessments in setting objectives
- Create species density objectives per wildlife population unit
- Regulatory framework based on umbrella species that triggers government action, including mandated monitoring and enforcement
2. Dedicated, Stable Funding
Core Position: Modern wildlife legislation requires more predictable, dedicated funding that links provincial revenue to provincial expenditure on wildlife and habitat.
Key Asks:
- Use HCTF as a robust conservation fund under the Wildlife Act
- What does it do? Restoration, research, conservation, enhancement, on-the-ground stewardship – making things better for fish and wildlife
- What does it NOT do? Inventory, monitoring, planning, provincial responsibilities
- Direct key revenues (licenses, fines, commercial use fees) into this fund
- Follow through with the promise to double the license surcharge flowing to HCTF
- Follow through on MWAC recommendations for funding needs (e.g., Together for Wildlife, Conservation Lands Program)
- Explore new forms of funding (e.g., industry charges, fines, hotel tax…) to direct revenue to wildlife conservation
3. Independent Science, Transparency, and Clarity
Core Position: Wildlife decisions must be based on transparent, independent science.
Key Asks:
- Allow for/encourage multiple independent data sources beyond provincial government data sets when making wildlife decisions.
- Improve data access and establish stronger vetting procedures to assess the quality and credibility of scientific data used
- Create an independent review or screening mechanism to avoid “data wars” where government, industry, or other parties fund competing low-quality or biased science
- Clarity on ambiguous and/or outdated terms within the Act (e.g., critical wildlife habitat, wildlife harassment, hunting expedition, ownership of/rights to wildlife)
- Transparent process for reconciling conflicting data sources (government, industry, Indigenous).
- Define minimum standards for wildlife inventory and monitoring
4. Governance Reform and Accountability
Core Position: Wildlife governance must be transparent, accountable, and inclusive.
Key Asks:
- Defined decision authorities and clear lines of responsibility
- Formal advisory roles for stakeholder groups
- Province-wide consistency in guidelines and interpretation
- Clear communication between federal and provincial species at risk listings, accountability to action on species at risk
- Commitment to the creation of species at risk legislation